In the modular blockchain world of 2025, data availability (DA) pricing is make-or-break for rollups chasing scalability without the Ethereum tax. With Ethereum’s ETH hovering at $2,997.60, Celestia and EigenDA are stealing the show by offering blob-like DA at fractions of legacy costs, even after Pectra’s glow-up. Rollups posting data blobs now weigh Celestia and EigenDA for yield-boosting restaking plays that undercut Ethereum’s native setup.
Ethereum Blobs Post-Pectra: Virtually Free, But Is It Enough?
The Pectra upgrade in May 2025 supercharged Ethereum’s DA game. Target and max blobs per block jumped, slashing costs to near-zero for rollups. Daily ETH burns from data posting? Plummeted. Galaxy Research nails it: blobs are virtually free, reshaping L2 economics. But here’s the rub, Ethereum’s alignment keeps it premium for security purists. Rollups still eye alternatives for pure cost arbitrage and restaking yields.
Flashback to early 2025 chaos: blobs hit $47 per MB in January peaks. Meanwhile, Celestia chilled at $0.10/MB, EigenDA at $0.05/MB. Fast-forward, Conduit data pegs Celestia at $7.31 per MB versus Ethereum’s $20.56 average. Post-Pectra, Ethereum fights back, but modular DA layers hold the undercutting edge for high-volume rollups.
Celestia’s Modular DA Pricing: 95% Savings Unlocked
Celestia reigns as the lowest-friction modular DA kingpin in 2025. Token Metrics crowns it for broad tooling and crystal-clear blob fee models. Its PayForBlob market? Simple pay-as-you-go bliss. Early adopters slashed DA costs by 99% versus old calldata tricks, per AMBCrypto.
Real-world proof: A May 2024 case study switched a rollup to Celestia, dropping monthly DA from $2,016 to $95 – that’s a 95.3% cut. Zeeve highlights Celestia’s scalable alt-DA prowess, perfect for L2s dodging Ethereum congestion. In 2025 SERPs, Eclipse Labs pits it against Avail and EigenDA, with Celestia winning on cost predictability. For restaking yield chasers, blobspace on Celestia pairs seamlessly with EigenLayer strategies, maximizing returns without Ethereum’s overhead.
Why does this matter for you? If you’re building or investing in rollups, Celestia’s pricing lets you pocket savings as yield. No more bleeding fees on data posts.
Celestia (TIA) Price Prediction 2026-2031
Forecasts amid DA restaking competition with EigenDA and Ethereum blobs, based on 2025 market data (ETH at $2,997)
| Year | Minimum Price (USD) | Average Price (USD) | Maximum Price (USD) | Est. YoY Growth (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $8.50 | $16.00 | $28.00 | 0% |
| 2027 | $14.00 | $25.00 | $42.00 | +56% |
| 2028 | $22.00 | $40.00 | $70.00 | +60% |
| 2029 | $38.00 | $68.00 | $120.00 | +70% |
| 2030 | $55.00 | $95.00 | $165.00 | +40% |
| 2031 | $75.00 | $135.00 | $240.00 | +42% |
Price Prediction Summary
Celestia (TIA) is positioned for substantial growth as the leading modular DA layer, offering 64-95% cost savings over Ethereum blobs and competing effectively with EigenDA. Conservative minimums reflect bearish cycles and competition, while maximums capture bullish adoption by L2 rollups and restaking yields. Average prices are projected to rise from $16 in 2026 to $135 by 2031, implying a ~740% cumulative growth, driven by Web3 scaling demands.
Key Factors Affecting Celestia Price
- Cost advantages over Ethereum blobs (e.g., $0.10/MB vs $47/MB peaks) and EigenDA ($0.05/MB)
- Increasing L2 rollup adoption post-Pectra upgrade for cheaper DA
- Restaking yields via EigenLayer boosting ecosystem but Celestia’s simplicity wins broad tooling
- Crypto market cycles with 2028-2029 bull run potential
- Regulatory clarity on modular blockchains and DA layers
- Technological scalability improvements in Celestia and competitors like Avail/NEAR DA
- Market cap expansion as DA becomes critical for Web3 scaling in 2025+
Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency price predictions are speculative and based on current market analysis.
Actual prices may vary significantly due to market volatility, regulatory changes, and other factors.
Always do your own research before making investment decisions.
EigenDA’s Ethereum-Aligned Play: Low Costs Plus Restaking Kicks
EigenDA flips the script with high-throughput DA secured by restaked ETH. Ethereum-aligned, it offers reserved and on-demand capacity – ideal for L2s wanting that secure feel without full Ethereum pricing. When blobs raged at $47/MB, EigenDA undercut at $0.05/MB, proving its mettle.
Restaking is the secret sauce. Stake 32 ETH via EigenLayer for EigenDA, bump APY from 3.5% to 8%. Validators stack yields across services, turning DA security into a revenue flywheel. Token Metrics flags EigenDA’s throughput edge, while Avail Forum tables show it neck-and-neck with Celestia on costs, but superior Ethereum synergy.
That Ethereum synergy? It’s a big draw for teams already deep in the ETH ecosystem. But let’s stack them up side-by-side to see who really undercuts Ethereum blobs in this DA restaking yield hunt.
Celestia vs EigenDA: 2025 Pricing Showdown
Picture this: Ethereum blobs, post-Pectra, flirt with free territory, but high-volume rollups still feel the pinch during peaks. Celestia’s PayForBlob keeps it predictable at fractions of Ethereum averages – think $7.31/MB vs $20.56/MB. EigenDA? Even sharper on-demand at rock-bottom entry points like $0.05/MB historically, scaling with restaked capacity.
Celestia vs EigenDA vs Ethereum Blobs – 2025 Pricing per MB, Cost Savings %, Restaking APY Boost, Throughput Comparison
| DA Solution | Price per MB (2025 Est.) | Cost Savings vs Ethereum Blobs (%) | Restaking APY Boost | Throughput | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum Blobs | Virtually Free (post-Pectra) | N/A | N/A | Baseline (enhanced capacity post-Pectra) | galaxy.com/insights/research/ethereum-blob-market-post-pectra; Token Metrics |
| Celestia | $0.10 | 64% – 95% | N/A | Highly scalable modular DA | conduit.xyz; markaicode.com/celestia-eigenda-data-availability-layer-guide; X · marilyn100x; eclipselabs.io |
| EigenDA | $0.05 | Up to 99% | 3.5% → 8% | High-throughput Ethereum-aligned | X · marilyn100x; zemyth.app/academy/docs/glossary/what-is-restaking; eclipselabs.io; Token Metrics |
Token Metrics and Eclipse Labs comparisons back this: Celestia edges on frictionless tooling, EigenDA on reserved slots for bursty L2 traffic. For celestia pricing 2025, expect steady under $10/MB with blobspace growth. Eigenda cost vs blobs? It shines for Ethereum-aligned rollups, often 80-90% cheaper in stress tests.
Don’t sleep on hybrid plays. Restake via EigenLayer to secure Celestia blobspace, blending Celestia’s cost edge with EigenDA’s yield machine. Check our deep dive on EigenLayer restaking for Celestia blobspace providers to see how providers lock in DA yields.
Restaking Yields: Blobspace’s Yield Goldmine
Here’s where DA pricing meets real money: restaking. Ethereum blobs don’t offer direct yield on data posts, but Celestia and EigenDA turn providers into earners. EigenDA leads with that 3.5% to 8% APY jump on 32 ETH – stack it across AVS for more. Celestia providers tap blobspace auctions, restaking TIA or ETH via partners for compounded returns.
Blobspace restaking yield is exploding. As rollups flock to cheaper DA, providers bid capacity with restaked assets, juicing APYs. Zemyth notes validators diversifying into EigenDA secure more ETH while Celestia keeps fees flowing. In a $2,997.60 ETH world, this arbitrage is catnip for stakers eyeing ethereum blobs da restaking alternatives.
Avail Forum and AMBCrypto tables echo: Celestia wins pure cost, EigenDA yield stacking. For L2 devs, celestia eigenda comparison boils to volume – low? Celestia. High-throughput with ETH loyalty? EigenDA.
Rollups like those on Eclipse Labs are mixing it up: post to Celestia for baseline savings, overflow to EigenDA for secured bursts. This duo undercuts Ethereum blobs across the board, freeing capital for sequencer yields or user rebates.
Picking Your 2025 DA Winner: Cost, Yield, or Both?
If you’re a rollup builder pinching pennies, Celestia’s 95% and savings scream winner – plug it in, watch fees vanish. Validators? EigenDA’s restaking flywheel multiplies your ETH workhorse. Investors, eye celestia vs eigenda token dynamics: TIA rides modular hype, EIGEN restaking dominance.
Our take? Don’t pick sides – layer them. Restake ETH for EigenDA throughput, outsource blobs to Celestia. This combo crushes Ethereum’s post-Pectra setup on eigenda cost vs blobs, especially as NEAR DA and Avail heat up. TokenMinds pegs alt-DALs slashing costs 8,000x in extremes – 2025’s the year modular DA owns scaling.
Stake your claim now. With ETH at $2,997.60, DA restaking yields beat holding solo. Dive into Celestia vs EigenLayer key differences for the full playbook, and start optimizing your rollup’s bottom line today.
About the Author
